Description | Spatial | Attributes |
Airborne Laser Terrain Mapping Survey utilizing dual-frequency airborne GPS control and conventional control were conducted in Waupaca County. The horizontal coordinates are referenced to the Waupaca County Coordinate System NAD83, (Feet), and the vertical datum is NAVD88 (Feet).
LiDAR data collection and quality control has been conducted in accordance wih the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidelines and specifications for gathering data necessary to create digital elevation models using the guidelines and specifications in place at the beginning of the task order. The survey includes select areas and over and within Waupaca County. Waupaca County LiDAR Survey was performed using government furnished maps outlining specific areas for the purpose of gathering data necessary to create digital elevation models in accordance with the guidelines and specifications directed by owner, and contract Scope of Work. The raw LiDAR data density (posting) will be approximately 3-meters. The total area of the survey is 70,339.72 acres.
The data design specifications for this product includes several directed to insure its quality, consistency, and useability. These specifications address some of the technical issues associated with orthoimage production: 1) the tops of buildings and other structures elevated above the surface of the ground 'tilt' away from the center point of the source photography and from their own bases as a result of perspective and their height which is not compensated for in digital elevation models of the ground surface and 2) individual orthoimages may be assembled from several source images (strips).
publication date
The data herein, including but not limited to geographic data, tabular data, analytical data, electronic data structures or files, are provided without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties or merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The entire risk as to the quality and performance of the data is assumed by the user. No guarantee of accuracy is granted, nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event, shall Waupaca County will be liable for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, loss of anticipated profits or benefits arising out of use of or reliance on the data. Waupaca County does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the data or as a result of changes to the data caused by system transfers or other transformations or conversions, nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the data in any manner or form. These data have been developed from the best available sources. Although efforts have been made to ensure that the data are accurate and reliable, errors and variable conditions originating from physical sources used to develop the data may be reflected in the data supplied. Users must be aware of these conditions and bear responsibility for the appropriate use of the information with respect to possible errors, scale, resolution, rectification, positional accuracy, development methodology, time period, environmental and climatic conditions and other circumstances specific to these data. The user is responsible for understanding the accuracy limitations of the data provided herein. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. The user should refer to the accompanying metadata notes for a description of the data and data development procedures.
501 Robert Blvd 2nd Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor
501 Robert Blvd, Second Floor Slidell, LA 70458
All ground control processing and adjustment is performed using published coordinate horizontal and vertical datums (e.g. NGS CORS). For deliverables, Corpscon for Windows Version 5.11.08 (geoid 99) was used for horizontal and vertical datum conversion as well as for coordinate system conversion purposes (e.g. UTM to Stateplane).
The accuracy assessment was performed using a standard method to compute the root mean square error (RMSE) based on a comparison of ground control points (GCP) and filtered LiDAR data points. Filtered LiDAR data has had vegetation and cultural features removed. Testing was performed prior to gridding of the filtered LiDAR data points and construction of the Intergraph .dtm file format. The RMSE figure was used to compute the vertical National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA). Ground control was established by 3001, Inc. A spatial proximity analysis was used to select edited LiDAR data points contiguous to the relevant GCPs. A search radius decision rule is applied with consideration of terrain complexity, cumulative error and adequate sample size. Cumulative error results from the errors inherent in the various sources of horizontal easurement. These sources include the airborne GPS, GCPs and the uncertainty of the accuracy of the LiDAR data points. This accuracy is achieved prior to the subsampling that occurs through integration with the inertial measurement unit (IMU) positions that are recorded. It is unclear at this time whether the initial accuracy is maintained. The horizontal accuracy of the GCPs is estimated to be in the range of approximately 1 to 1.6 inches. Finally, sample size was considered. The specification for the National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy is a inimum of 20 points to conduct a statistically significant accuracy evaluation (Minnesota Planning, 1999, Positional Accuracy Handbook, Minnesota Planning Land Management Information Center, St. Paul, Minnesota., p.3). Most statistical texts indicate that a minimum of 30 sample points provide a reasonable approximation of a normal distribution. The intent of the NSSDA is to reflect the geographic area of interest and the distribution of error in the data set (Federal Geographic Data Committee, 1998, Geospatial National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy, Federal Geographic Data Committee Secretariat, Reston, Virginia, p.3-4).
Internal feature number.Definition Source:
ESRI
Feature geometry.Definition Source:
ESRI